Re: CLUSTER FREEZE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Date: 2013-11-19 17:23:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZRWgfyR-o689_aLDFeyPR7tgJBXUPM-rZVr71toc_-6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yes, we probably should make a decision, unless Robert's idea can be
>> implemented. We have to balance the ease of debugging MVCC failures
>> with the interface we give to the user community.
>
> Imo that patch really doesn't need too much further work.

Would you care to submit a version you're happy with?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-19 17:24:29 Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-11-19 17:18:19 Re: Large offset optimization and index only scan