| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup |
| Date: | 2014-10-06 16:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZGMJn-G8XsdscZgA+Ggr0Y=17K6n42BPcR8S+tZRMXtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marco Nenciarini
<marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>> - Ship a table-of-contents file with a list relation files currently
>> present and the length of each in blocks.
>
> Having the size in bytes allow you to use the same format for non-block
> files. Am I missing any advantage of having the size in blocks over
> having the size in bytes?
Size in bytes would be fine, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-10-06 16:24:32 | Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-06 16:19:03 | Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup |