| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |
| Date: | 2011-07-21 19:25:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ9YEmy+dwybkLOBJbm2Hyc4yvr=c7p52oNK0SX6CDv9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think the real challenge is going to be testing. If anyone has a
>> machine with weak memory ordering they can give me access to, that
>> would be really helpful for flushing the bugs out of this stuff.
>> Getting it to work on x86 is not the hard part.
>
> I believe there's a PPC box in our storage facility in NJ that we
> might be able to dig out for you. There's also a couple in our India
> office. Let me know if they'd be of help.
Yes!
More processors is better, of course, but having anything at all to
test on would be an improvement.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-07-21 19:29:41 | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Yeb Havinga | 2011-07-21 19:25:21 | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |