| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit |
| Date: | 2013-12-18 15:17:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ=vBdFtGtch=+JiOviB=_EaUsbJO3dN7jgnR60+VPQoA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Me either; at the very least, it's short an underscore: wal_log_hint_bits
>> would be more readable. But how about just "wal_log_hints"?
>
> +1 for wal_log_hints, it sounds better.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-12-18 15:39:02 | Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-18 15:14:42 | Re: row security roadmap proposal |