Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS
Date: 2014-11-20 16:18:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYwyLyuJfp33qj6BTh_16pMfWNoOWbVc_KVOYMQt+C-=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> The applicable parts of
> that patch could be backpatched as a bug fix (but evidently no one cares
> about building contrib with pgxs (except when I submit a patch to remove
> it)).

Touché.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-11-20 16:22:37 Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-11-20 16:13:48 Re: On partitioning