Re: Extension Templates S03E11

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extension Templates S03E11
Date: 2013-12-03 13:20:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYvL0F2zGRnSOu=dru_8jxzTOXAd7=WuHzC0xadGLtX_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>> > I don't see why we are trying to accommodate a case where the author
>> > doesn't offer enough full SQL scripts and offers broken downgrade
>> > scripts; or why that case is different from offering broken upgrade
>> > scripts.
>>
>> That's fair enough I guess. I will work on automating the choice of the
>> first full script to use then, for next patch version.
>
> Can we separate this feature out? It's an issue with extensions today,
> and I'm eager to make some progress after the explosion of differing
> opinions today.

+1 for separating that part out. I thought it was separated, at some point.

> Robert, do you think this is an acceptable approach to solve your pet
> peeve here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA
> +Tgmoae3Qs4QbQfxOUzZFxRSxA0zy8ibSOYSuuTzDUMPeAkAg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com

I'd need to look exactly what's being proposed in more detail.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-12-03 13:24:46 Re: logical changeset generation v6.7
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-12-03 13:18:54 Re: logical changeset generation v6.7