Re: Last gasp

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-05 20:41:49
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYqRW0qDynCsi6Wi-hAaeUo7GG5H2rxi-PKgBJibRt0TQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/5/12 12:56 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>>> Really?  You've never seen a patch punted to the next release before
>>> > because it wasn't robust enough?  Considering that I see your  name
>>> > mentioned in the 8.2 release notes, I find that a bit hard to believe.
>> I must admit I did check it only occasionally and to me it seemed to
>> come along nicely.
>
> I have to agree ... for anyone just following the email thread, the
> patch did not seem to be in trouble.  I'm not clear that Dimitri knew
> that it was, either.

I said repeatedly that there wasn't enough time to get this done for
9.2, starting many weeks ago. It would have been more clear if I'd
had time to hone in on the specific problems sooner, but see the other
note I just sent for why that didn't happen.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-04-05 21:03:31 Re: Last gasp
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-04-05 20:40:23 Re: Last gasp