Re: Sequence Access Method WIP

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Date: 2014-11-08 15:46:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYiKUG335uw3B6ZhUgacszz6OorC3M56E7j-icZ6-Vc5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Honestly, I am still not convinced that the centralized sequence server with
> no local caching is something we should be optimizing for as that one will
> suffer from performance problems anyway. And it can ignore the last_value
> input from postgres if it choses to, so it's not like the currently proposed
> patch forbids implementation of such AMs.

I can buy that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-08 16:24:39 Re: row_to_json bug with index only scans: empty keys!
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-11-08 15:42:15 Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers