Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth
Date: 2013-10-30 12:22:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbWuFnoGXAavgSfeoHKHYpwMFdpedjjannixBMik3o8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The last two buildfarm runs on frogmouth have failed in initdb,
>> like this:
>>
>> creating directory d:/mingw-bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.2492/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data ... ok
>> creating subdirectories ... ok
>> selecting default max_connections ... 100
>> selecting default shared_buffers ... 128MB
>> selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... windows
>> creating configuration files ... ok
>> creating template1 database in d:/mingw-bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.2492/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data/base/1 ... FATAL: could not open shared memory segment "Global/PostgreSQL.851401618": Not enough space
>> child process exited with exit code 1
>
> In windows implementation of dynamic shared memory, Size calculation
> for creating dynamic shared memory is assuming that requested size for
> creation of dynamic shared memory segment is uint64, which is changed
> by commit d2aecae, so we need to change that calculation as well.
> Please find the attached patch to fix this problem.

I find it hard to believe this is the right fix. I know we have
similar code in win32_shmem.c, but surely if size is a 32-bit unsigned
quantity then size >> 0 is simply 0 anyway.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-30 12:23:11 Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2013-10-30 11:29:40 Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments