| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Date: | 2015-09-23 01:22:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYOFiKqDZtq9hGDcCQVu3N-wssiJO6OJjb3Mbe9NfP-Sg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> PlannedStmt is needed because we are passing the same from master
> to worker for execution and the reason was that Executor interfaces
> expect it.
I thought we were passing the Plan and then the worker was constructed
a PlannedStmt around it. If we're passing the PlannedStmt then I
guess we need PlanInvalItem too, since there is a list of those
hanging off of the PlannedStmt.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-23 01:27:33 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-09-23 01:18:43 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |