| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ivan Lezhnjov IV <iliv(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch |
| Date: | 2013-11-08 14:04:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYL5b9Ae3X5vTtoz=d=nOfnrF4eNdJvmkM3Bx=ydsAZhw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> This isn't software, it is docs. It is ridiculous to suggest we break this
> up into 3-4 patches. This is a small doc patch to a single doc file
> (backup.sgml).
I don't think it's ridiculous, but you can certainly disagree.
>> superuser privileges; it's the selective-dump case where you can often
>> get by without them. I've attached a proposed patch along these lines
>> for your consideration.
>
> That's fair.
Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2013-11-08 14:06:23 | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-11-08 14:00:09 | Re: shared memory message queues |