| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
| Date: | 2017-04-07 17:55:51 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY3zr=9UqQ18X=7r=1NSR9uWj4bd3atg0SfL4bBKQYKtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Marked as ready for committer.
Andres seems to have changed the status of this patch to "Needs
review" and then, 30 seconds later, to "Waiting on author", but
there's no actual email on the thread explaining what his concerns
were. I'm going to set this back to "Ready for Committer" and push it
out to the next CommitFest. I think this would be a great feature,
but I think it's not entirely clear that we have consensus on the
design, so let's revisit it for next release.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-07 18:00:01 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-07 17:54:57 | Re: Performance issue with postgres9.6 |