| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Back-branch releases upcoming this week |
| Date: | 2011-09-20 14:36:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoxEjmxH-BD22NLe-nUmTLVTCU2CXuyFHZOqLEEpbDp_pA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/9/20 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
>
> On 09/20/2011 10:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> I don't think we've yet decided what the policy means if a release
>> happens during the stated calendar month, which seems rather likely
>> this time around in view of our historical record of doing updates
>> roughly quarterly. Should we settle that detail now? That is,
>> does "after December" really mean "in or after December", or did we
>> really mean "after"?
>>
>>
>
> If we really want to get that specific, let's just say that the EOL date is
> at the end of the designated month.
+1
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-20 14:39:32 | Re: Back-branch releases upcoming this week |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-09-20 14:35:11 | Re: Back-branch releases upcoming this week |