| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: On partitioning |
| Date: | 2014-08-30 02:39:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFc70XP1PWQ3=iZPWByb=cTLNNdfLQ2Y_u5WDHcp0-NPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Prompted by a comment in the UPDATE/LIMIT thread, I saw Marko Tiikkaja
> reference Tom's post
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1598.1399826841@sss.pgh.pa.us
> which mentions the possibility of a different partitioning
> implementation than what we have so far. As it turns out, I've been
> thinking about partitioning recently, so I thought I would share what
> I'm thinking so that others can poke holes. My intention is to try to
> implement this as soon as possible.
>
+1.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-08-30 03:27:27 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? |
| Previous Message | David G Johnston | 2014-08-30 01:23:05 | Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence? |