Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date: 2013-06-25 02:40:41
Message-ID: CA+HiwqF87EZjk+SJWC6-w298mHyLFCY1e1eHSN26zKu-N8wZig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> parameter improvement idea is which we extend ini file for to set
> parameter each standby. For example :
>
> --------------------
> [Server]
> standby_name = 'slave1'
> synchronous_transfer = commit
> wal_sender_timeout = 30
> [Server]
> standby_name = 'slave2'
> synchronous_transfer = all
> wal_sender_timeout = 50
> -------------------
>

Just ask to clarify:

Is 'slave2' a failback standby?
What does 'synchronous_transfer = all' mean? Does that mean wait
during both commit and checkpoint?

--
Amit Langote

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-25 02:44:42 Re: C++ compiler
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-06-25 02:32:42 Re: C++ compiler