Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2013-04-22 19:57:31
Message-ID: CA+CSw_vsxb0FsA-f=4PS_-eygv_TZeQsFSXXsxbPChL8dBRrxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 20:32, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Assuming that we only ship a plain C implementation with 9.3, what
>> are we missing on that front? The C implementation of FNV1+SHIFT is
>> only a few dozen lines or so.
>
> Forgive me, I can't seem to locate the patch for this? Re-post please,
> just for clarity.

Not posted yet. I'm writing it as we speak. Will post within half an hour or so.

Regards,
Ants Aasma
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2013-04-22 19:59:01 Re: Performance with the new security release?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-04-22 19:54:40 Re: Enabling Checksums