Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility

From: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility
Date: 2012-10-19 02:26:54
Message-ID: CA+CSw_u9U6NSSCFkNYzG2DA2nf=zxAhA3Jzbp3dy=tRk5YHZOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmm. Maybe we should think of implementing this as REMOTE TABLE, that
> is a table which gets no real data stored locally but all insert got through
> WAL
> and are replayed as real inserts on slave side.

FWIW, MySQL calls this exact concept the "black hole" storage engine.

Regards,
Ants Aasma
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-10-19 02:41:22 Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Previous Message Daniel Farina 2012-10-19 01:22:53 Re: Deprecating RULES