Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog

From: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
Date: 2012-06-04 16:06:48
Message-ID: CA+CSw_swtpx8=d-+ew3WZR4teX8nohgJ5QFuheJm3xT=4vVG7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> No, it's more a "there's no reason to do that". I don't think it
> should necessarily be an actual problem.

Ok, good to know.

> In your case the missing piece of information is why was there a
> timeline switch? pg_basebackup shouldn't cause a timeline switch
> whether you use it in -x mode or not.

No mystery there. The timeline switch was because I had just promoted
the master for standby mode. There's a chance I might have
accidentally done something horribly wrong somewhere because I can't
immediately reproduce this. I'll let you know if I find out how I
managed to create this error.

Ants Aasma
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2012-06-04 16:06:53 Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-06-04 15:53:02 Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog