| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, AlexHunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standard_conforming_strings |
| Date: | 2010-07-15 13:20:29 |
| Message-ID: | BF458803-C6DF-4395-A972-B16A76F067B5@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
> On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
>>>> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...
>>>
>>> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
>>> cycles on it."
>>
>> Should we do this? Patch attached.
>
> Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying "WARNING: The PGDG currently plan to change this setting's default in 9.1"?
Well, mostly that we could change our mind if it makes too big a boom. And it's not as if we could go back and update everyone's docs after-the-fact. I agree we need some press, but the docs are not the right vehicle.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Artur Dabrowski | 2010-07-15 13:29:51 | Re: Incorrect FTS results with GIN index |
| Previous Message | Artur Dabrowski | 2010-07-15 13:09:30 | Incorrect FTS result with GIN index |