| From: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Date: | 2014-04-07 09:59:00 |
| Message-ID: | BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB7713DDDF090@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07 April 2014 12:12, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>+1 for feature
Thanks
>-1 for Oracle syntax - it is hardly inconsistent with Postgres
We can discuss and come out with the syntax based on everyone agreement.
>Autonomous transactions should be used everywhere - not only in plpgsql
Yes you are right. I am not planning to support only using plpgsql. Initially we can support this
Using the standalone SQL-commands and then later we can enhance based on this infrastructure
to be used using plpgsql, triggers.
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-04-07 10:11:38 | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Rajeev rastogi | 2014-04-07 09:53:45 | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |