Re: Annoying Reply-To

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
Cc: "\"Mikkel Høgh\"" <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: 2008-10-17 12:10:16
Message-ID: BB941A7D-1C80-4F86-888A-A8198A9C60A7@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance


On Oct 17, 2008, at 8:01 , Bill Moran wrote:

> In response to "Mikkel Høgh" <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>:
>>
>> but having to manually add a Reply-To
>> header to each message I send to pgsql-general is not my idea of fun.
>
> I was not aware that Apple Mail was such a primitive email client.
> You
> should consider switching to something that has a reply-to button.
> I'm
> very disappointed in Apple.

It's not. It has Reply and Reply All buttons for the clicky-clicky
folk, and keyboard shortcuts for each as well.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-17 12:23:12 Re: PQescapestringConn not found in libpq.dll
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-17 12:06:33 Re: Annoying Reply-To

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikkel Høgh 2008-10-17 12:25:00 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-17 12:06:33 Re: Annoying Reply-To