Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Date: 2011-06-16 18:35:23
Message-ID: BANLkTinN6C8q61Fb8ASZVOPbYq7VoqoHOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oh, actually it's so easy. Thanks.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> On 16.06.2011 21:13, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
>> My current idea is to measure number of IO accesses by pg_stat_statements
>> and measure CPU usage by /proc/PID/stat. Any thoughts?
>>
>
> Actually, you get both of those very easily with:
>
> set log_statement_stats=on
>
> LOG: QUERY STATISTICS
> DETAIL: ! system usage stats:
> ! 0.000990 elapsed 0.000000 user 0.000000 system sec
> ! [0.000000 user 0.008000 sys total]
> ! 0/0 [32/0] filesystem blocks in/out
> ! 0/0 [0/959] page faults/reclaims, 0 [0] swaps
> ! 0 [0] signals rcvd, 0/0 [0/0] messages rcvd/sent
> ! 0/0 [10/1] voluntary/involuntary context switches
> STATEMENT: SELECT generate_series(1,100);
>
>
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-16 19:02:16 Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2011-06-16 18:30:48 Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch