Re: the big picture for index-only scans

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Date: 2011-06-19 14:44:28
Message-ID: BANLkTimsw4fFw-+aR5p_3u8iz5Yz=DqHmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/5/14 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Cédric Villemain
> <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If reviewers agree it is safe and benchmarks make evidences that no
>> basic performance  issue are raised, then let's see if next items have
>> blockers or can be done.
>
> Sounds right to me.

and recent stuff on VM will allow us to move forward it seems !

--
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Shanab 2011-06-19 15:04:33 Libpq enhancement
Previous Message Hitoshi Harada 2011-06-19 14:30:54 Re: Patch: add GiST support for BOX @> POINT queries