Re: branching for 9.2devel

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: branching for 9.2devel
Date: 2011-05-04 14:36:10
Message-ID: BANLkTim_d_VKaU751GYvn_RCs+BkHkeT7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Mind you, I've read more than enough horribly-formatted patches to wish
> that we could do something about this.  But I doubt that a mechanical
> reformatting pass before reviewing will be a net plus.

It wouldn't hurt to have the option.

It would also be nice if we could come to some conclusions on how to
handle $SUBJECT.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-05-04 15:11:57 Re: DLL export with mingw-w64: currently a no-op
Previous Message Mitsuru IWASAKI 2011-05-04 14:10:48 patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation