| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable? |
| Date: | 2011-06-15 21:54:56 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTimXs=cgSHQStKgKnTCtMZmNAaMj6Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
>
> I'm already on it. The whole patch appears to need some review,
> considering this is about the fourth major flaw we've found in it.
I'll leave it with you then, but I remain happy to fix.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-15 22:19:06 | Re: flexible array members |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-15 21:50:15 | Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |