Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: rajibdk <rajib(dot)deka(at)siemens(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby
Date: 2011-04-21 10:38:27
Message-ID: BANLkTikw3qdXtMtZWG6DDK_UKk8RXUsHRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, rajibdk <rajib(dot)deka(at)siemens(dot)com> wrote:

> What does that database system identifier means? Is it related to DB
> transactions’ or unique to a version?

Regrettably, it means you didn't follow the documented procedure.

It isn't possible to do it any other way, so those questions are a distraction.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2011-04-21 11:15:48 hot backups: am I doing it wrong, or do we have a problem with pg_clog?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-04-21 09:38:56 Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby