Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring
Date: 2011-06-19 18:41:59
Message-ID: BANLkTikv51occ+UHWAttuuNL7OEqz9FTJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Yikes.  I think you are right.  It's kind of scary that the regression
>> tests passed with that mistake.
>
> Can we add a test that exposes that mistake?

Not sure. We'd have to figure out how to reliably tickle it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-19 18:52:12 Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-19 18:40:44 Re: the big picture for index-only scans