| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs |
| Date: | 2011-05-16 02:13:07 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTik69On0R0gFE0koRZ0mY_E8qMU2QA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> still, we have a problem... because we are happily ignoring correctely
>> created casts...
>> at least, we should document that casts on domains are ignored and
>> that we should use the base types instead, maybe even a warning or a
>> notice when issuing the CREATE CAST command using domains...
>>
>> make the user think everything is fine when it's not is not a good idea
>
> +1.
>
ok, i will make a patch for this... btw, why is that we allow to
create those casts at all? or we can deny them?
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-16 02:14:45 | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-16 02:04:51 | Re: Extension Packaging |