From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: time table for beta1 |
Date: | 2011-04-04 16:13:12 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=OJqO2mCV4CWQmfs2QgX8CE=_nWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> At the risk of getting laughed at, how about, say, ~2 weeks from now?
>>
>> Seems reasonable to me.
>>
>>> Plus or minus a couple of days based on people's schedules and which
>>> day of the week we'd like the wrap to happen on.
>>
>> Betas are usually done using the regular release process, which is
>> wrap-on-Thursday-release-on-Monday (to accommodate both packagers who
>> work weekdays and those who can only spare time on weekends). So we'd
>> really be talking about code freeze on the 14th if we want release on
>> the 18th. That might be a bit ambitious, but we can always slip it a
>> week if unforeseen problems crop up.
>
> The following weekend appears to be Easter, so it'd have to be a 2 week slip.
Well, that's certainly an incentive to try to hit the April 14th date.
Having to wait until April 28th would be the pits, IMHO.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2011-04-04 16:23:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 16:08:38 | Re: Compiling a static libpq |