| From: | "Denis Lussier" <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Affan Salman" <affan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim Mlodgenski" <jimm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 |
| Date: | 2005-06-27 08:05:33 |
| Message-ID: | B319CFEC3B80D3408CA36F99ADE840940F28D1@edb-dc1.Edb-net.EnterpriseDB.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Affan,
Please read this SQL/PSM thread over and then address how EDB did it (and of course how you would recommend generalizing it for PG 8.2).
Perhaps our SQL/PSM could be designed from the ground up with "debugability" :-) in mind.
--Luss
________________________________
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl]
Sent: Sun 6/26/2005 6:06 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: Denis Lussier; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:06 -05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I've seen some example code on the EnterpriseDB website using their SPL
> language, and it doesn't seem to be handled like "just another PL". The
> function body does not look at all like quoted strings, as in our
> regular PLs. I don't know how they did it, but I don't think they added
> support for the whole language to the main parser.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2005-06-27 08:30:16 | Re: contrib/rtree_gist into core system? |
| Previous Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2005-06-27 07:48:49 | Re: contrib/rtree_gist into core system? |