Re: CommitFest wrap-up

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest wrap-up
Date: 2010-12-13 18:05:56
Message-ID: AANLkTinvni2acnFYaMttAN06wT2qKqt-C68w16iPn2gz@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2010 12:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> - SQL/MED - core functionality - Seems clear to move this to the next
>> CF and keep working on it.
>
> [...]
>>
>> - SQL/MED - file_fdw - Discussion is ongoing, but I see no harm in
>> marking this Returned with Feedback for now in anticipation of a new
>> version before CF 2011-01.
>> - SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw - Hasn't received as much review, I think,
>> so should probably be moved to next CF as-is.
>>
>
> Don't we need the core patch before the FDW patches? I hope that the core
> patch is completed and committed ASAP so we have a chance to get the FDW
> patches in.

The core patch will certainly need to be committed first. But I doubt
that's going to happen in the next few days. If we get it in before
the next CF starts, I think we'll be doing very well.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-13 18:12:15 Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-12-13 18:05:37 Re: hstores in pl/python