| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
| Date: | 2011-01-22 02:18:38 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinsBXG+KZ8p2rUx-33y1kaC2ugUBB-=iksXiGyE@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:
> Yup. And I'm OK with that. In my case, it would be much better to
> have a few quick failures, which can complete automatically a few
> seconds later then to have a big buildup of transactions to re-verify
> by hand upon starting manual processing.
Why would you need to do that?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-22 03:06:11 | Re: READ ONLY fixes |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-01-22 01:32:18 | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |