From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL FDW update |
Date: | 2011-02-10 13:12:02 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinqujZRkOgeFg0WjwWR_vQPLi8bbN5bAM6kRdwj@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I needed something to test the FDW API patch with, and didn't want to get
> involved in the COPY API changes, and also wanted to have something that
> needs real connection management and can push down quals. So I updated the
> postgresql_fdw patch to work with the latest FDW patch.
>
> Here. It's a bit of a mess, but it works for simple queries..
>
> It requires a small change to the FDW api
> (fdw-api-add-serverid-userid.patch). I added server oid and user oid fields
> to the FdwPlan - that seems like basic information that most FDW's will
> need, so it seems awkward to require the FDW to wrap them in Const nodes and
> a List.
>
> These are also available in my git repository at
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/heikki/postgres.git, branches fdw2 and
> postgresql_fdw.
So how close are we to getting the core support committed?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2011-02-10 13:13:01 | Re: psql patch: tab-complete :variables also at buffer start |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 13:09:40 | Re: Add support for logging the current role |