| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Date: | 2010-10-08 14:55:49 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinqN45iL+a9Rm7O0PDK3Zu_1vxnjP5qqWXXaex3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >From the perspective of an observer, randomly selecting a standby for
> load balancing purposes: No, they are not guaranteed to see the "latest"
> answer, nor even can they find out whether what they are seeing is the
> latest answer.
To guarantee that each standby returns the same result, we would need to
use the cluster-wide snapshot to run queries. IIRC, Postgres-XC provides
that feature. Though I'm not sure if it can be applied in HS/SR.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-10-08 14:57:21 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-10-08 14:53:20 | Re: Git cvsserver serious issue |