From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |
Date: | 2010-05-19 15:19:46 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinjuu2qtymMsAyvI2oeGACNSarL63078bxw9tvl@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> given how much faster the new format is (or rather how slow the old one
>>>>> was) and the number of people I have seen complaining "why is bytea so
>>>>> slow) I would like to see it staying turned on by default. However this
>>>>> also depends on how quickly database driver developers can adapt.
>>>
>>> DBD::Pg is already patched, and will very likely be released before 9.0
>>
>> How do the distros generaly deal with that? E.g. do we have to wait
>> for RHEL7 for it to actually show up in redhat?
>
> Yeah, that's what I'm worried about. I remember going through this
> with E'' quoting. It wasn't fun.
Right. So do we know what the policy is? As long as DBD::Pg is
released before pg 9.0 we'd be fine, *provided* that they
(redhat/novell/debian/whatever) actually pull in the latest version at
that point...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Wong | 2010-05-19 15:28:22 | Fwd: PDXPUG Day at OSCON 2010 |
Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-05-19 15:16:42 | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |