Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer(at)linz(dot)govt(dot)nz>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use
Date: 2010-08-19 13:46:17
Message-ID: AANLkTini8WSviPm4ybGZh1JAcO=OBQQd2QhChWCmSPcS@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer(at)linz(dot)govt(dot)nz> writes:
>> Could it be that I have too much memory allocated for postgresql? My resource settings are:
>> shared_buffers = 94952
>> temp_buffers = 1GB
>> work_mem = 19339
>> maintenance_work_mem = 191845
>> max_stack_depth = 2MB
>
> 1GB for temp_buffers is a *LOT*.  You do realize that's per backend?
> Those other settings don't look too unreasonable.

Definitely - particularly since this is a 32-bit version, that's
getting very close to the address space limits...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Derrick Rice 2010-08-19 15:23:22 Re: Warm Standby and resetting the primary as a standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-19 13:42:21 Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use