| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest wrap-up |
| Date: | 2010-12-14 03:13:08 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinhU6vy5hR=yrp1xymfc9bY9iskNQm8A1G9L=tT@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/13/10 9:37 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - synchronous replication - and...
>> - synchronous replication, transaction-controlled - If we want to get
>> this feature into 9.1, we had better get a move on. But I don't
>> currently have it in my time budget to deal with this.
>
> I thought we'd covered most of the major issues here. What's holding
> these up?
I don't know where you got that idea. We have two competing patches
neither of which has been updated in several months. And neither of
which has gotten a whole lot of review, either. We spent a lot of
time arguing about basic design and then everyone got tired and went
on doing other things.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-14 03:17:14 | Re: hstores in pl/python |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-14 03:10:27 | Re: rest of works for security providers in v9.1 |