| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers |
| Date: | 2010-07-08 07:51:22 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTindHOnV5wmBublRA4FQMEqYwOEF_iLGH5oj1ujO@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> What was the final decision on behavior if fsync=off?
>
> I'm not sure we made any decision, per se, but if you use fsync=off in
> combination with SR and experience an unexpected crash-and-reboot on
> the master, you will be sad.
True. But, without SR, an unexpected crash-and-reboot in the master
would make you sad ;) So I'm not sure whether we really need to take
action for the case of SR + fsync=off.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Golub | 2010-07-08 07:57:23 | Re: keepalive in libpq using |
| Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-07-08 07:15:38 | Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions |