From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: top-level DML under CTEs |
Date: | 2010-09-13 19:14:49 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinVeefjte4_NvFwPWfEvanR=49Q9eeajjV42Bc4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Just to be clear, the attached patch is missing the part of the wCTE
> that allows queries of the form:
> WITH foo AS (DELETE * FROM bar RETURNING *) <any query using foo>
Understood.
> IOW, your CTE query has to be a select. This is still highly useful
> however.
Agreed.
> The patch itself looks very clean after a quick glance
> (which is all I can offer ATM unfortunately).
Yeah, I haven't had a chance to look at it either, just wanted to send props.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-13 19:28:22 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-09-13 18:43:18 | Re: top-level DML under CTEs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-09-14 00:44:46 | Re: top-level DML under CTEs |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-09-13 18:43:18 | Re: top-level DML under CTEs |