Re: Void binary patch

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: rsmogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Void binary patch
Date: 2011-02-22 17:39:25
Message-ID: AANLkTinTOyjnyPoTuUh9kZTQdpn2An06sY4vw7xdmyyO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:22 AM, rsmogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:12:23 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Radosław Smogura
>>> <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
>>>
>>> What problem does this fix?
>>
>> void returning functions may not be called when binary protocol is
>> requested currently.  this is annoying: some drivers that wrap libpq
>> or the protocol directly use the binary mode exclusively and this
>> causes headaches for them.  put another way, 'void' is the only POD
>> type missing send/recv.
>>
>> merlin
>
> Just curious what POD means?

POD = 'Plain Old Data' -- one of the core types. :-).

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-22 18:09:24 Re: Void binary patch
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2011-02-22 17:09:38 Re: pg_resetxlog display bogosity