| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
| Date: | 2011-02-14 05:25:57 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinF=DLP20ZJ57mkVa4ofTVLBMYn+pcRsqFMXK-=@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I added a XLogWalRcvSendReply() call into XLogWalRcvFlush() so that it also
> sends a status update every time the WAL is flushed. If the walreceiver is
> busy receiving and flushing, that would happen once per WAL segment, which
> seems sensible.
This change can make the callback function "WalRcvDie()" call ereport(ERROR)
via XLogWalRcvFlush(). This looks unsafe.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2011-02-14 06:13:06 | Re: Scheduled maintenance affecting gitmaster |
| Previous Message | YAMAMOTO Takashi | 2011-02-14 05:09:23 | Re: SSI bug? |