Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date: 2010-05-05 03:38:05
Message-ID: AANLkTinDIyJgOZqPBymJA6bMiw3ZCrCau6Lp1h5eZ1Ko@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Should I be concerned that we are redesigning HS features at this stage
> in the release?

Yep. You can decide whether you want to be concerned by the redesign
itself, or by the concerns about the underlying code that are
motivating the redesigns, but yes, you should definitely be concerned.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-05 03:53:27 Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-05 03:06:32 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful