Re: Add support for logging the current role

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> +1 for choosing something more mnemonic than "%o", btw.
>
> Alright, not to be *too* ridiculous about this, but I'm feeling like
> '%R' might be better than '%U', if we don't mind overloading a single
> letter based on case.  I've always been annoyed at the lack of
> distinction between 'user' and 'role' in our docs and feel it does lead
> to some confusion.
>
> Updated patch attached, if people agree.  Compiles, passes regressions,
> works as advertised, etc.

I was thinking that %u/%U would have the advantage of implying some
connection between the two things which is in fact present. %r/%R
seems not quite as good to me. Also, let's paint it tangerine.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company