Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook
Date: 2010-05-24 13:18:40
Message-ID: AANLkTin3PhJ-j-VJYgSa5MET7PSYGQ800MEB53mzTHl4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/5/24 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> BTW, I guess the reason why permissions on attributes are not checked here is
> that we missed it at v8.4 development.

That's a little worrying. Can you construct and post a test case
where this results in a user-visible failure in CVS HEAD?

> The attached patch provides a common checker function of DML, and modifies
> ExecCheckRTPerms(), CopyTo() and RI_Initial_Check() to call the checker
> function instead of individual ACL checks.

This looks pretty sane to me, although I have not done a full review.
I am disinclined to create a whole new directory for it. I think the
new function should go in src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c and be declared
in src/include/utils/acl.h. If that sounds reasonable to you, please
revise and post an updated patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-24 13:20:53 Synchronization levels in SR
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2010-05-24 12:17:14 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?