From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: exposing COPY API |
Date: | 2011-02-08 13:49:36 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin0__cXY-uqjLQuFauuSuEZxGV7UC1EzGPTzWjw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:49:09 +0900
> Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 09:38, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> > Here is a patch against the latest revision of file_fdw to exercise this
>> > API. It includes some regression tests, and I think apart from one or two
>> > small details plus a requirement for documentation, is complete.
>>
>> The patch contains a few fixes for typo in the original patch.
>> Hanada-san, could you take them into the core file_fdw patch?
>
> Thanks, I've applied to my local repo.
>
> s/Centinel/Sentinel/
> s/Vaidate/Validate/
> s/reaind/reading/
>
> Recent file_fdw is available here:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/hanada/postgres.git;a=summary
>
> I'll submit revised file_fdw patch after removing IsForeignTable()
> catalog lookup along Heikki's proposal.
So I'm a bit confused. I don't see the actual copy API change patch
anywhere here. Are we close to getting something committed there?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-02-08 14:00:27 | Re: Named restore points |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-08 13:48:08 | Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases) |