| From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY |
| Date: | 2010-07-23 17:17:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimz=Dd1LO9mrqxO67hRAuoAagrQHPoO_UNerJQr@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:00, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Alternatively we could make it
> work with just primary keys until the other patch gets in. I think
> that makes sense, find that attached. Thoughts?
*sigh*, find attached a version that removes talk of unique not null
constraints from the docs
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| func_deps_v4.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 3.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2010-07-23 17:52:39 | Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-07-23 17:00:58 | Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY |