| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: template0 database comment |
| Date: | 2011-03-12 09:48:02 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimyjoJNCR+HRXZd+QnMEwE_Ru9pccCd6HWQMMpV@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
>> attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
>> initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
>
>> + "COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by pg_dump';\n",
>
> No objection to the concept, but the actual text of this comment is
> approximately 100% wrong.
>
I'd like to lodge a formal objection to the use of the word
'approximately' in the above comment.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-03-12 10:40:39 | Re: On-the-fly index tuple deletion vs. hot_standby |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-12 08:53:11 | Re: template0 database comment |