| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Varchar and binary protocol |
| Date: | 2011-02-10 08:20:23 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimy5MFe5hEwbW-zGOFnjq6kyB9hBK29j5F4tvZp@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Radosław Smogura
<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> Thursday 10 February 2011 08:48:26
>> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Radosław Smogura
>>
>> Since there is basically zero difference in how *varchar* is handled
>> in the database for the text or binary protocols (AFAIK, they use the
>> same code), this is almost certainly an issue with the JDBC driver, or
>> your benchmark application.
>>
>> merlin
>
> Actually difference is
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg00415.php
>
ah, I stand corrected -- interesting.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | YAMAMOTO Takashi | 2011-02-10 08:48:26 | SSI bug? |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2011-02-10 08:15:28 | Re: Transaction-scope advisory locks |