Re: system views for walsender activity

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: system views for walsender activity
Date: 2011-01-04 19:43:17
Message-ID: AANLkTimt-TkwS8YLLM68Ce+9BuV6xRs2Fx6o4V-7EjVY@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 20:28, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> hmmm I think "pg_stat_standby" might be more relevant but I definitely
>>> agree something more newbie appropriate is in order.
>>
>> I'd be fine with that name, too.
>
> That seems kind of backwards though - given that the view only
> contains data on the master...

I think pg_stat_replication is better than pg_stat_standby, but I'm
still not convinced we shouldn't go with the obvious
pg_stat_walsenders.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-01-04 19:48:46 Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-04 19:31:26 Re: system views for walsender activity