Re: MERGE command for inheritance

From: Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Date: 2010-08-13 08:25:47
Message-ID: AANLkTimmeSAFTEMO2MeJdg6uLH4QLzmuMj1L1sYDFwx2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> On 13/08/10 09:27, Boxuan Zhai wrote:
>
>> I have renewed the merge.sql and merge.out in regress. Please have a look.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Did you change the way DO INSTEAD rules are handled already?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg00151.php
>
>
Yes. This mistake has been corrected a few editions ago. Now, the actions
replaced by INSTEAD rules will still catch tuples but do nothing for them.

> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
>
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Adams 2010-08-13 09:45:23 patch: General purpose utility functions used by the JSON data type
Previous Message Joseph Adams 2010-08-13 07:12:44 Re: patch: utf8_to_unicode (trivial)